Angels & Demons

Lots of people had told me that Angels & Demons is a big step up compared to The Da Vinci Code, the previous film version of a Dan Brown book. Lots of other people, whether they liked the books or not, said Brown is a methodical writer. After a while you can guess how his book will evolve. I may not have read his books and I was fortunate enough to skip The Da Vinci Code, but I can believe these people. It didn’t take me long to find out who the culprit of Angels & Demons was.

However… ages ago, I decided that – if I’d ever read a Brown book – it would be Angels & Demons, mainly because I found the use of the ambigram in the book’s title excellent. The ambigram gets a cameo of about two seconds in the film.
You see, Brown is the sort of chap who puts as much knowledge and facts in his thrillers in an attempt to look really clever. I don’t know how intelligent the man is, so it’s not a cheap shot at the man’s brain, but my view of the subgenre I think the book belongs to: the fact-soaked thriller.
CERN got a lot of attention in the book and it wouldn’t be until they started their Large Hadron Collider they would get as much attention. In the book and film CERN produce antimatter, so much that a villain has plans to destroy the world (or at least the Vatican) with it. This is where your suspension of disbelief has to start working overtime: antimatter couldn’t be produced in such big quantities and you can’t make an antimatter bomb…
Facts that make the entire series of events in the book/film look rather senseless.

If you strip those notions from the film, you just get an excess of chasing scenes, albeit in lovely Rome, so at least you can stare at the architecture. Or Ayelet Zurer (playing Vittoria Vetra), whose main function in the film is to be stared at. I don’t dislike Tom Hanks at all, but this role didn’t do anything for me: it left me neither warm nor cold. Not that I blame Hanks or Ron Howard, the blandest of Hollywood’s directors, it’s just an uninteresting character made up by Dan Brown: a professor who knows some facts. Now, ain’t that fascinating? No, it’s rather like a talking encyclopedia or in this case, given Brown’s rate of wrong facts, a walking Wikipedia.

Oh, Armin Mueller-Stahl and Ewan McGregor are also in the film. Mueller-Stahl is by far the best of the entire cast and the only one who managed to make me feel anything else but apathic. The film is overlong, several scenes are unconvincing and then there’s the climax of the film, which is quite pompous and utterly silly. The biggest credit to the cast and director is that they manage to complete the film looking less idiotic than the plot actually is. If that’s an achievement, let’s crack open a bottle of champagne.

So, rather than boring you about a film that never deserved the attention it got, let me refer you to the ambigrams. Much more exciting.

3.5/10

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Angels & Demons

  1. Rex July 19, 2009 / 07:26

    Let’s get real here, there aren’t too many movies that are filled with realism.

    I’m also in the category of – not a fan of Dan Brown’s writing style, it’s too juvenile and tedious. His books are far-fetched, so did we expect the movies to be any less?

    The DaVinci Code certainly didn’t deserve all of the controversy it received and I think to date it’s Ron Howards second worst film, right after Cinderella Man.

    As for A&D, I loved it. This is the first film wherein I enjoyed the entire cast. And the first role of Ewan McGregor’s that I actually found interesting. Quite frankly, I thought he gave the best performance of the film.
    Thank goodness they didn’t bring back TDC’s Audrey Tatou, she was annoying as hell. The new sidekick Ayelet Zurer fit into the cast perfectly. She’s actually a fantastic actress, however, this material didn’t give her a chance to flex her acting muscles.

    Frankly, I can’t wait for the DVD, the Special Features should be awesome.

  2. Marcie December 24, 2010 / 06:20

    That was a good read and informative. You obviously know your stuff!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s